ExoPolitical Waves II

June 8, 2010

Did a Cape Canaveral rocket, HAARP or ET/UFOs cause the June 5, 2010 Australian spiral light?

Filed under: Uncategorized — bearmarketnews @ 8:33 pm


June 7, 4:34 PMSeattle Exopolitics ExaminerAlfred Lambremont Webre

Did a Cape Canaveral rocket, HAARP or ET/UFOs cause the June 5, 2010 Australian spiral light?

DavidWilcock: Australian spiral light June 5, 2010 5:50 am

A UFO that was “a perfect spiral of light” according to eyewitnesses over Eastern Australia at 5:50 AM on June 5, 2010 has given rise to the same speculation as the December 9, 2009 spiral seen over Oslo, Norway the night before U.S. President Barack Obama’s Nobel Prize speech.

As with the December 9, 2009 Norway spiral, conventional scientists proposed a conventional explanation of a missile of space junk for the June 5, 2010 UFO spiral. One Australian report stated “An astronomer says a bright spiraling light spotted in the sky by people across eastern Australia was probably a satellite, space junk or a rocket.”  Another report stated “It is not clear what the light was although there is speculation it may have been the Falcon 9 rocket which launched into space yesterday.”  In fact a Falcon 9 missile was launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida about an hour before the spiral lit up over three states in eastern Australia.

As was the case with the December 9, 2009 Norway spiral, HAARP or some similar human electromagnetic technology is another plausible explanation for the June 5, 2010 Australian UFO spiral, which was large enough to be seen over three Australian states.  Researcher Colin Andrews has proposed HAARP as the cause of a series of anomalous weather effects over southeastern Australia in January 2010.  Australia itself is rumoured to have its own HAARP facility.

If the Falcon 9 rocket was not the cause of the spiral, then perhaps HAARP was, as the path of the UFO spiral light tracks the path of January 2010 anomalous weather patterns over Eastern Australia that were attributed to HAARP.

There is a third possibility, that the June 5, 2010 Australia spiral was a genuine interdimensional “wormhole,” caused by a hyperdimensional or multi-dimensional intelligence.  Some researchers speculated that the Norway spiral was caused by a hyperdimensional intelligence.

Researcher David Wilcock writes, “The Norway Spiral is back — but this time it’s jumping all over the place in the skies of Australia. This is a manmade phenomenon that shows Disclosure is getting closer and closer all the time!  The longer the oil spill goes on unchecked, the faster we can expect to see Disclosure really happen. There are plenty of technologies capable of plugging the spill, and those who are in a position to disclose, and ready to disclose, made a fantastic leap forward with this latest phenomenon.”

Mr. Wilcock continues, “As the oil disaster has mushroomed in scope, I found something I had forgotten about: namely the year 2010 is directly flagged in the Pyramid Timeline as the year where ‘the bottom will fall out of the world.’ If you look at a diagram of the internal passages of the Pyramid, and look at the Subterranean Chamber, there is an area that dips lower than the others that is called the ‘Pit.’ The lowest depth of the Pit begins in the year 2010. This was openly predicted in Lemesurier’s 1977 book as the year where the materialistic world would reach the full extent of its visible collapse — to help usher in a mass awakening.”

This Examiner.com article reviews data surrounding the Australia spiral and its possible causes.  A follow-on Examiner.com article will explore the acceleration of disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence and of sequestered quantum access and anti-gravitic new energy technologies that a prolongation of the BP oil spill operation may result in.

The June 5 Australia spiral was the result of the Falcon missile – Australian TV

Examiner.com readers can view a video from Australian TV that correlates the spiral light phenomenon to a Falcon 9 missile that had launched from Cape Canaveral about an hour prior to the 5:50 AM light on June 5, 2010.

News reports also appear to confirm that the spiral light was more probably than not the result of the Falcon 9 missile.

US rocket launch sparks Australia UFO frenzy (AFP)

SYDNEY — A bright spiralling light, believed by astronomers to be a rocket launched from Cape Canaveral, was spotted in skies across Australia’s east coast just before dawn Saturday, sparking a UFO frenzy.

Described by some witnesses as a “lollipop-type swirl”, the cloud of light was seen over the country’s three easternmost provinces — New South Wales, Queensland and the Australian Capital Territory — shortly before sunrise.

“It had a distinct bright centre, much like a bright star … (with) trails spiralling and fattening out from it,” Canberra resident James Butcher told broadcaster ABC of the spectacle, which he said lasted two or three minutes.

Other witnesses likened the spectacular phenomenon, footage of which was quick to hit the Internet, to a “huge revolving moon” with a swirl in the middle, or an illuminated cloud moving high and fast above the horizon.

“It certainly had that lollipop-type swirl … but it was travelling low and fairly fast, and as it went past me and I looked up, it looked like a row of lights, maybe four lights,” one Brisbane resident said.

Astronomer Andrew Jacob, acting curator of the Sydney Observatory, said it was most likely SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, launched Friday from Cape Canaveral shortly before dawn broke over Australia.

“It fits best, a rocket travelling overhead with something venting out of it, fuel venting out of the motor,” Jacob told AFP.

“The rocket’s probably tumbling or spinning a little which creates a spiral effect, a little like water coming out of a hose when you spin it. That’s the best explanation I have so far, probably the most likely one.”

The light was travelling the wrong way for it to be an astronomical phenomenon, and Jacob said he had ruled out other possibilities such as comets, a spotlight on cloud or reflection of the moon, or a meteor shower.

He said the timing was right for the SpaceX rocket to have travelled over the Atlantic Ocean, Africa and the Indian Ocean and be in skies over Australia at the time the spiralling light was seen.

The fact that it could be seen over such a broad area meant whatever caused the flare had to be very high in the atmosphere or in orbit above the Earth, Jacob added.

“All the information points to this SpaceX rocket,” he said.

The launch of the privately owned Falcon 9 test rocket marked a milestone for the space industry in the race to develop commercial carriers capable of ferrying cargo and astronauts to the orbiting International Space Station.

The case for the Australian spiral as a HAARP creation

Although the case for the Australian spiral being the product of the Falcon 9 test rocket (or some other rocket) is a strong one, a plausible case can be made for the Australian spiral as a man-made creation of HAARP, or some other electromagnetic technology.

In Mystery deepens around Norway spiral light: pyramid UFO over Kremlin, and Russia and China lights, this reporter wrote that:

“The scientific mystery of the ultimate source of the Dec. 9, 2009 Norway spiral light deepened with the revelation of a Dec. 9 pyramid UFO over the Kremlin in Red Square, Moscow (the same night as the Norway light) and of similar vortex lights to the Norway light over Russia and China. (See videos below).

“No definitive solution has been yet offered for these phenomena, assuming they are related.  Aside from the conventional explanation of Russian missile failure, the major alternative scientifically based alternative explanations offered so far include:

“(1) Extraterrestrial civilizations causing both the giant UFO pyramid over the Kremlin and the failure of the Russian Bulava missile (which led to the Norway light spiral), as a context communication message to the Russian military establishment to cease its development of intercontinental missiles;

“(2) HAARP, the space-based weapon of mass destruction, caused the electromagnetic plasma light effects visible over Norway on Nov. 9, on the eve of Barack Obama’s Nobel Prize speech either as a warning to Barack Obama, or as a possible Project Blue Beam mass psychological conditioner assuming Obama is an agent of a corporate new world order.  The Kremlin pyramid UFO could be a Project Blue Beam artificial electromagnetic or plasma artifact under this hypothesis.

“Other interpretations concluded, “that it could be a wormhole opening up, while others linked the event to the recent high-energy experiments undertaken at the Large Hadron Collider in Switzerland.”

(3) Hyperdimensional wormhole created by an extraterrestrial or hyperdimensional intelligence, perhaps for purposes of signalling a disclosure intent to humankind.

David Wilcock and the spiral light phenomena

Researcher David Wilcock believes that the Australian spiral is man-made, like the December 2009 Norway spiral, which he and other researchers suggest is the product of HAARP or a similar man-made technology.  As to the December 9, 2009 Norway spiral, Mr. Wilcock states, “Survey the incredibly wide-ranging evidence — including video — that certain insider factions are pushing for UFO/ET Disclosure very soon. The Norway Spiral is only the most recent attempt to ‘force’ the issue — after the US failed to deliver [ET disclosure] on November 27th, [2009]’”

Mr. Wilcock writes of the June 5 Australia spiral, “The Norway Spiral is back — but this time it’s jumping all over the place in the skies of Australia. This is a manmade phenomenon that shows Disclosure is getting closer and closer all the time!  The longer the oil spill goes on unchecked, the faster we can expect to see Disclosure really happen. There are plenty of technologies capable of plugging the spill, and those who are in a position to disclose, and ready to disclose, made a fantastic leap forward with this latest phenomenon.”

Mr. Wilcock speculates that there is a pro ET/UFO disclosure “white hat” military intelligence faction controlling the technology creating the Norway and Australian spirals as positive psychological conditioners for extraterrestrial disclosure.

HAARP and southeastern Australia weather phenomena

There is a recent history of possible HAARP-caused weather events in the southeastern to eastern area of Australia where the spiral light was also see.

On January 27, 2020, researcher Colin Andrews writes “This Dramatic Spiral Burst known to ‘insiders’ as The Ring of Fire Fault was observed on national radar over Melbourne Australia today – but then what?  Is this the HAARP smoking gun?  Its been a very busy twelve days for anybody interested in strange weather effects, possible weather modification experiments or the secret agenda behind the global HAARP project. So lets recap where this started, on this website on January 15th, 2010  (16th in Australia) and which has now exploded into a potentially very important story.”

If the June 5, 2010 Australian spiral light was caused by HAARP or a similar covert human technology, then its purpose may have been as psychological warfare or conditioning to be seen as a “UFO” or extraterrestrial event.

As this reporter wrote regarding the 2009 Norway light, “Both the China and the Russia vortex lights appear susceptible to interpretation as either (1) failures of a missile or similar aerospace hardware; (2) extraterrestrial or interdimensionally induced phenomena or (3) HAARP or other electromagnetically induced plasma light phenomena.

“Researcher David Wilcock has posited that HAARP, a space-based weapon of mass destruction one of whose antenna fields is close to the site of the Norwegian spiral light.  According to David Wilcock, one of his confidential sources stated the Norway spiral light was part of Project Blue Beam.  Mr. Wilcock’s interview appears on the Project Camelot Radio show with Kerry Cassidy.

“Mr. Wilcock’s discussion of the plasma effects of the 18-layered energy field surrounding the Norway light seems to be persuasive that HAARP may indeed be the source of those, as well as the China and Russia lights.  If some case were to be made that the Dec. 9 Kremlin UFO were a human artificial Blue Beam construct as well, Project Blue beam would be the common denominator behind all of these events.

“One of the alleged purposes of Project Blue Beam is the use of advanced electromagnetic imaging such as that produced by HAARP and exhibited in the Norway spiral light as a psychological mass conditioning device in aid of the implementation of a global corporate new world order.

The Australian spiral light as a genuine inter-dimensional “wormhole”

Given the closeness in time to the overflight of the Falcon 9 rocket and the availability of HAARP or a similar man-made technology as a possible cause, the case that the Australian spiral light is a genuine interdimensional wormhole becomes more difficult.

Several researchers maintain that the December 2009 Norway spiral light and related spiral lights in Russia and China are interdimensional wormholes created by an intelligent civilization.

One argument used by certain researchers to support the view that the December 9, 2009 Norway spiral was its association with paranormal events occurring over the Kremlin in Moscow, Russian Federation at the same time.

The context communication theory of extraterrestrial communication posits that extraterrestrial or UFO encounters can be symbolic communications from a higher intelligent civilization to a human civilization.

Jean-Charles Duboc of Exopolitics France and Dr. Michael Salla are the principal proponents of the extraterrestrial communication interpretation of the December 9, 2009 Norway-Kremlin spiral light and UFO events.  Mr. Duboc writes:

“The [Nov. 9, 2009] failure of the [Russian Bulava missile] and the UFO over the Kremlin – the interpretations that I give are these:

“1 / These two demonstrations of technological power are primarily intended for military and political power in Russia.

“2 / The Sixth failure of Bulava missile, if it was caused by an extraterrestrial civilization, is a condemnation of such tests.

“3 / These two events are a destabilization of military power (failure of the missile) and political power (a UFO over the Kremlin).

“4 / These two events are also a warning if not a threat:

– A threat to the military to destroy their nuclear toys.

-A threat to the political power by making them understand that they are not immune to aggressive action, domination, right in Moscow.

“5 / These two events are also a message of change and hope – not the military leaders and political leaders, but for the people:

-Hope – Stopping a final race for weapons of mass destruction if a civilization intervenes.

-Hope to make contact with extraterrestrial civilizations and benefit from technologies to solve energy problems and climate.

“6 / A sign that the aliens have been here for millennia, like the pyramids …

“That’s where we are, and the event of aliens over the Kremlin is certainly the first in a long line [of similar events] above the capitals of the world.

“Moreover, the video of the UFO over Red Square has achieved in Russia a record viewership on Youtube because the information was repeated in the media.

“What happened recently in Russia is absolutely remarkable, and we must prepare for an acceleration of history and an increase in UFO sighting on Earth.

“We are not at the end of surprises to come…”

Jean-Charles Duboc (translated from the French)

Mr. Duboc does not provide analysis as to why the Dec. 9 Norway lights are not HAARP or a similar Project Blue Beam-connected mass conditioning phenomenon.

How to evaluate the Australian spiral and other spiral phenomena

1.  Over-projection – Researchers in the area multi-dimensional phenomena have created a policy literature of over-projection based on different putative causes of the spiral light phenomena, be it the December 9, 2009 Norway spiral or the June 5, 2010 Australian spiral or the Russia and China spirals.  As no definitive causes have been established for the spiral light phenomena in any of these cases, this causes large confusion and cognitive dissonance in the growing reading public.

2.  Cause of the June 5 Australian spiral light – Based on the evidence, this reporter leaves it up to each reader to evaluate what they think is the cause.  Readers are welcome to state their own conclusions in the comments section below.

3.  Relationship of the Australian spiral light to the BP oil spill – Researcher David Wilcock has posited an interpretive framework in which the spiral light phenomena are positive signals being created by a pro-ET/UFO disclosure faction within the global power structure.  Within this interpretive framework, a meaningful relationship can be seen between the June 5, 2010 Australian spiral and the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.  Mr. Wilcock sees both of these as accelerating disclosure of extraterrestrials and of advanced quantum access and anti-gravity technology.

If in fact the Australian spiral light is the product of the Falcon 9 rocket, then there is no apparent relationship of the spiral to ET/UFO disclosure.

4.  The BP oil spill as accelerating ET/UFO disclosure – A future Examiner.com article will address the effects of the BP oil spill as accelerating disclosure of extraterrestrials and of advanced quantum access and anti-gravity technology, and as a catalyst to the end of the petroleum-nuclear age of human civilization.

Seattle’s relationship to Exopolitics and this article:  According to Examiner.com, this reporter -Alfred Lambremont Webre – is “one of two experts in the field of exopolitics and this topic doesn’t generally lend itself to a local angle”.  This reporter is very proud to have this Exopolitics Examiner column based in Seattle.  Historically, “the modern phenomena of UFOs and ‘flying saucers’ began in Washington state on June 24, 1947, when Kenneth Arnold spotted nine mysterious, high-speed objects ‘flying like a saucer would’ along the crest of the Cascade Range near Mount Rainier. His report made international headlines and triggered hundreds of similar accounts of ‘flying saucers’ locally and across the nation.”  A local Seattle connection is thus embedded into every Examiner.com article this reporter has the privilege to write for our Seattle audience.
For more info:
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of any organization with which the author may be affiliated.

Click here tofindout   more!

Permission to use extracts & copyright notice
Note: Permission is granted to include extracts of this article on websites and email lists provided a link is included to the original. This article is copyright © and should not be added in its entirity on other websites or email lists without author’s written permission. For permission please contact: exopolitics@exopolitics.com

June 1, 2010

Aliens Like Us

Filed under: Uncategorized — bearmarketnews @ 11:39 pm

In These Times

Features » May 31, 2010

Aliens Like Us

Anthropologist Scott Littleton believes the truth is out there, somewhere.

By George Kenney

On the left: Avatar’s Neytiri, Star Wars’ Yoda and Scott Littleton. On the right: the photos accompanying the Feb. 26, 1942, Los Angeles Times cover story “Air Raid.” The caption reads: “SEEKING OUT OBJECT—Scores of searchlights built a wigwam of light beams over Los Angeles early yesterday morning during the alarm. This picture was taken during blackout; shows nine beams converging on an object in sky in Culver City area.”

“To my mathematical brain, the numbers alone make thinking about aliens perfectly rational,” says Stephen Hawking, in the new Discovery Channel series Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking. “The real challenge is to work out what aliens might actually be like.” Hawking is the author of the 1988 best-seller A Brief History of Time.

“We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn’t want to meet,” he says. “I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonize whatever planets they can reach.”

But trying to make contact with alien races is “a little too risky,” he says. “If aliens ever visit us, I think the outcome would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans.”

But maybe Hawking is being a little simple—or hasn’t seen Avatar. Regardless, Lord Martin Rees begs to differ with the world’s most famous theoretical physicist.

In January, Rees, astronomer to the Queen and a professor of cosmology and astrophysics in the Institute of Astronomy at Cambridge, spoke at the Royal Society of London conference, “The Detection of Extra-terrestrial Life and the Consequences for Science and Society.”

Rees, president of the Royal Society, which celebrated its 350th anniversary this year, said: “I suspect there could be life and intelligence out there in forms we can’t conceive. Just as a chimpanzee can’t understand quantum theory, it could be there are aspects of reality that are beyond the capacity of our brains. They could be staring us in the face and we just don’t recognize them. The problem is that we’re looking for something very much like us, assuming that they at least have something like the same mathematics and technology.”

So, what’s up with all this talk about aliens? Scott Littleton, an expert on Arthurian legend and professor emeritus of anthropology at Occidental College in Los Angeles, has some answers.

You were eight years old and growing up in Hermosa Beach, when, in the early hours of Feb. 25, 1942, you witnessed what came to be known as the “Battle of Los Angeles.” What happened?

First, remember, this was soon after Pearl Harbor, and two days after the Elwood Oil installation off Santa Barbara had been shelled by a Japanese submarine that had surfaced there. Anyway, I’m sleeping, when suddenly I heard the anti-aircraft guns going. This was about 3:15 a.m. I noticed the sky was very bright, so I look out the window and I see searchlight beams and shells exploding overhead. Something crazy was going on. My father said, “I better see what is going on, this might be the real thing.” So he threw on his air warden gear and went out. My father soon ran back in and says, “Everybody get down in the bomb shelter.” So we all go into the basement, in these old cramped quarters. And my mother was there for about 30 seconds, then she hustles out this little door and I snuck out behind her and we saw practically overhead—and I swear to this day it was hovering—this lozenge-shaped object like an elongated silver bug directly overhead. And outlined by seven or eight searchlight beams. They had it pinpointed. But it was glowing in addition to the searchlight beams. And it was surrounded by exploding shells that were falling on the beach.

How long did you and your mother observe this thing?

We were outside for ten minutes or so. It was hovering directly overhead. Then it began to lose altitude and veered inland over Rodando Beach and we lost sight of it.

If, as some people have suggested, it was a barrage balloon that had drifted, these anti-aircraft shells would have torn it to pieces. My guess is that it was surrounded by a forcefield of some sort that protected it—like something out of Star Wars.

How long did it take you to start thinking of it as a UFO and not just an unexplained phenomenon?

Decades. Not until the late ’70s. Afterwards, Frank Knox, the secretary of the Navy, held a press conference and said it was a “false alarm” due to “war nerves.” To this day that is the official interpretation. [Editors note: A Long Beach Independent editorial put it this way:”There is a mysterious reticence about the whole affair and it appears that some form of censorship is trying to halt discussion on the matter.”]

But there is not just that one dramatic sighting, there are scores and scores of such sightings. People see things flying around in the atmosphere. And you think these are objects that have come from somewhere else. As an anthropologist, what is your explanation for this?

I wish I had an explanation. The UFO phenomenon has been around for at least 10,000 years. A case can be made that our earliest ancestors noted them on cave walls in the Late or Upper Paleolithic.

Some people are convinced that the creatures who fly the things are responsible for bioengineering the human race. That’s ridiculous. You don’t need aliens to account for the evolution of homo sapiens.

I do think that they’re probes. At the beginning of the Ice Age, they discovered creatures who were intelligent but vastly more primitive than themselves. And—here I’m projecting my thoughts into their heads—they were curious and wanted to see what would happen to these creatures.

For all we know, these creatures and their craft are the equivalent of a mechanical rabbit at a dog track. We don’t know what’s being shown to us.

I see that, but I do think that you have to pay attention to the vast amount of anecdotal evidence. Nobody to my knowledge has a real picture of an alien. Nevertheless, there seem to be several varieties. And my hunch is—using the principle of parsimony, Occam’s razor—it’s better to assume that they originate in this universe and in this galaxy and probably in this corner of this galaxy. That is, within a several hundred light-year range.

If they’re using some type of technology that allows them to travel at light speed, then one has to think that at some point in the development of the universe some race developed this technology and at some point would have propagated it so that an intergalactic civilization would be not just a few thousand years ahead of us, but a million years ahead of us.

I understand that hypothesis. But if they’re vastly superior to us, why were they having so many crashes in the late ’40s and early ’50s? Somebody that far ahead, you wouldn’t expect to have operational failures. That’s what intrigues me.

As a former bureaucrat, I’d say that even in a bureaucracy that’s been around for a while you’re going to have things that don’t work as often as they do work.

Well yeah, technology isn’t infallible.

So you’ve got somebody driving around who doesn’t know how to fix it, something goes wrong. There could be a lot of different explanations.

Flying under the influence?

Yeah. [Laughs.]

I would peg them at thousands of years ahead of us rather than millions.

You have the hypothesis that there is a sort of Star Trek prime directive where the intergalactic civilization is not supposed to contact the primitive world, and that then you have some races of aliens who are breaking these rules.

I’m skeptical of people who suggest that they built the pyramids or built Stonehenge. On a whim, someone might have violated the rules and helped nudge a stone into place and was called on the carpet for it. But we have some interesting mythological ways to think about this. One of those involves the “rebel deity.”

Prometheus is the archetype, the god who is a culture-bearer but then goes away. In fact, Montezuma thought that Cortez was that deity coming back. He found out later that that was incorrect. And Lucifer, the rebel angel that comes down and gives human beings wisdom. He does the same thing that Prometheus does, but the only difference from the Hellenic tradition is that Prometheus is a hero and in the Biblical tradition Lucifer is a villain.

You have had a long and distinguished teaching career. At what point did you start talking publicly about UFOs?

The point at which I couldn’t be fired. A number of well-known academics involved in this subject have suffered from retaliation. There was an unsuccessful attempt to remove tenure from the late John Mack, who was a psychiatrist at Harvard Medical School and a Pulitzer Prize-winning author [in 1977 for A Prince of Our Disorder: The Life of T E. Lawrence]. Others have not been so lucky. So I started to come out of the UFO closet by the end of my teaching career. But I confess: I was a little reticent to do so.

I interviewed Edgar Mitchell once, the sixth man to walk on the moon. He believes in UFOs. He is also from Roswell [N.M., the site of the alleged UFO crash in June or July 1947]. Did you know that?

Yes, I did in fact.

This exchange was adapted from a podcast interview on ElectricPolitics.com.

  • Help In These Times publish more articles like this. Donate today!
  • Subscribe today and save 46% off the newsstand price!
  • Or win a subscription to In These Times by taking this short survey!
George Kenney, a a former career U.S. foreign service officer, resigned in 1991 over U.S. policy toward the Yugoslav conflict. He is now a writer in Washington. This interview is adapted from a podcast on www.electricpolitics.com, which Kenney produces and hosts.

More information about George Kenney

May 28, 2010

Informal UFO/ET disclosure now happening in leaked UFO/ET reports via U.S. Capitol Police

Filed under: Uncategorized — bearmarketnews @ 11:16 pm


Informal UFO/ET disclosure now happening in leaked UFO/ET reports via U.S. Capitol Police

Seattle Exopolitics ExaminerAlfred Lambremont Webre

An officer of the U.S. Capitol Police has leaked reports of UFO and hyperdimensional extraterrestrial spacecraft flyovers over the U.S. Capitol, using her active email account as a U.S. Capitol Police officer on the staff of the U.S. Senate Sergeant-at-Arms.  The U.S. Capitol Police officer, who has requested anonymity, made available the leaked reports, written by a former U.S. Capitol employee, in 2008 and 2009 to researcher and author Robert M. Stanley after Mr. Stanley made research inquiries of the U.S. Capitol Police regarding Wilbur “Will” Allen’s documentation of 2002 UFO/ET flyovers over the U.S. Capitol.

The leaked reports via the U.S. Capitol Police officer, which Mr. Stanley has examined and claims appear to be valid reports, confirm specific UFO/ET flyovers on April 22, 1999 and in spring 1995 in P-51 restricted airspace over the U.S. Capitol.

Mr. Stanley has made these leaked reports via the U.S. Capitol Police officer public in an exclusive Exopolitics Radio interview with reporter Alfred Lambremont Webre, and in the Examiner.com article below.

These leaked reports contain prime eyewitness witness evidence of UFO/ET over flights over the U.S. Capitol by the U.S. Capitol Police, trained officers in charge of the physical safety of the U.S. Capitol area.  The U.S. Capitol Police, according to Mr. Stanley, report to the National Security Agency (NSA) on matters relating to incursions into P-51 protected airspace by UFO/ET flyovers or landings on protected buildings, such as the U.S. Capitol, the White House, the reflecting pool, etc.

The leaked reports via the U.S. Capitol Police officer confirm the assertions of Wilbur “Will” Allen, a former White House employee and Air Force One engineer under U.S. Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton, that a U.S. Capitol Police officer had informed him in 2002 when he filed photos of UFO/ET flyover with them that the U.S. Capitol Police were experiencing similar UFO/ET flyovers over the U.S. Capitol to the ones Mr. Allen was photographing, as reported in a May 19, 2010 Examiner.com article, UFODC-Obama adviser says documented UFO/ET landings on U.S. Capitol “could destabilize society.

These reports via the U.S. Capitol Police officer are not a formal announcement or official “disclosure” by the U.S. Capitol Police of a frequent UFO/ET presence in the U.S. Capitol area.  The reports do constitute a significant unofficial UFO/ET disclosure by a former U.S. Capitol employee through the active email account of a current U.S. Capitol Police officer at the U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms office of the UFO and hyperdimensional presence in the protected airspace of the U.S. Capitol and the White House.

Listen to ExopoliticsRadio.org interview on informal UFO/ET disclosure how happening via U.S. Capitol Police

To listen to a 55 minute in-depth interview with Robert M. Stanley, please click here.

The first leaked UFO/ET disclosure via the U.S. Capitol Police

The following is a verbatim report as leaked to Robert M. Stanley in 2008 via a U.S. Capitol Police officer in the U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms office. In his ExopolticsRadio.org interview, Mr. Stanley speculates that mode of release of the UFO/ET reports in 2008 was designed to preserve anonymity and non-attribution, while preserving evidence of an official connection to the U.S. Capitol Police.

Robert M. Stanley notes that a video of the UFO/ET flyover of the U.S. Capitol was taken at the first event.  According to Mr. Stanley, “the video was never made public and was probably confiscated and classified.”

According to Mr. Stanley, this first report was written by the retired U.S. Capitol employee and is written in the first person “I,” referring to the employee himself.

Former U.S. Capitol employee


Date – April 22, 1999:

“Around 11:00 a.m., myself, a group of tourists and a Capitol police officer

were standing on the west steps of the US Capitol when we noticed something

strange flying at about 15,000 feet. It was moving gradually from

north to south over the US Capitol Dome.

“The object was a bright, silver, disc shaped UFO. It was moving

relatively slow and would stop on occasion. I recall there was a

bright white flash emitting from it about every minute or so, we

couldn’t tell if it was from the object or a reflection from the sun

coming off of it.

“The object was flying in a rather odd pattern. It would stop for

many seconds, then make a sharp left or right movement, then start

moving straight again. At times it looked like it was moving in a

zig zag pattern, then it would make right-angle turns. It’s hard to

explain. We couldn’t figure out what this was because the area it

was flying in was prohibited/restricted air space.

“The Capitol police officer with me notified his superior about the

object, but I don’t know what they did about it. The object was

literally straight up above the Capitol dome and was also seen by

the tourists.

“We watched the object for about 20 minutes until it moved out of

site, toward Virginia.

“I have continued to wonder about it and have tried to find anyone

else that saw the UFO when I did.

“Have you ever heard of a bright flash coming from any of the

sightings you have researched in D.C.? The flash was not like a

beacon light from an airplane, I can only describe it as a huge

camera flash that would flash roughly every 20-30 seconds.

“We were looking directly at the bottom of this thing since it was

right over head. The objects top was a shiny silver sphere with a

shiny silver square style bottom. It was something that I can’t

explain and haven’t seen before.

“I know my time line is vague but it was around spring time, in

April I think around 11:00 a.m. in the morning. I wish I would have

written down the information when we had the sighting. I saw the

police officer the other day that was with me that morning and he

still remembers it like I do.

“I wish I could find an explanation. I don’t work on Capitol Hill

anymore. I am using my wife’s (Capitol Police) e-mail account. I

used to work there, but left in 2000. I still have many friends on

the police that I might be able to get information from.”

“I recall that one of the tourists visiting the Capitol that day had

a video camera and captured the entire event. However, that footage

has not yet been made available to the public. Or, *_perhaps it was

_**_ confiscated_*?

“The Capitol Police officer who experienced the sighting with me is

now a lieutenant. When the sighting occurred he did report it to his

superior because the craft was in prohibited/restricted air space,

but I don’t know what happened with that report or any follow up


“I said then when we were watching the UFO that I think its taking

photographs. I’m sure there are a lot more incidents that occur, but

we will never hear about any of them.”

© RMS 2010

This leaked report and the one below are copyrighted 2010 by Robert M. Stanley and will appear in his forthcoming book “Close Encounters in Washington, D.C.

The second leaked UFO/ET disclosure via U.S. Capitol Police

This is the second leaked UFO/ET disclosure via U.S. Capitol Police.

Former U.S. Capitol employee


Date: Spring 1995

“In 1995, when this sighting occurred, ‘X’ had only been a Capitol Police officer for a couple of  years.

As  of 2009, ‘X’ has been on the police force for many years

and is a well-respected, ranking officer on the Capitol Police force

“Although ‘X’ had never given UFOs a second thought, that all

changed one morning at the Law Library Door. For those who aren’t

familiar, the Law Library Door is located just left of the main

center steps on the East side of the US Capitol.

“The day started as most do with tourist and other people standing

in line to visit the most powerful building in the world. The Law

Library Door is traditionally used as a staff entrance an

occasionally for the visitor unable to conquer the 220 steps leading

into the Rotunda.

“As the morning rush ended and things finally started to slow down

‘X’ walked out of the Law Library Door to get a little fresh air at

the bottom of the main Capitol steps.

“As he gazed across the plaza toward Upper Senate Park, he was

startled by an amazing sight. At that time, he saw 3 glowing

spherical UFOs that were each about 3 feet in diameter. At first,

they hovered about 100 feet above the ground, but then they began

flying silently in and out of the trees in the upper portion of

Senate Park. Baffled, ‘X’ yelled out to the other officer who

accompanied him that morning. He said, ‘Hurry – you have to get a

see this!’

“As the other officer arrived, the UFOs were just exiting the park

and starting to move up Constitution Ave. As they watched the UFOs,

the Capitol Police officers noticed these strange spheres were

flying at about the same height as the Russell, Dirksen and Hart

Senate office buildings.

“The UFOs were soon following each other in unison until they

abruptly made a sharp right turn on First Street NE and continued

south in the direction of the U.S. Supreme Court.

“As the UFOs approached the Supreme Court they made very erratic

left to right movements and would change position in what seemed to

be a game of intergalactic follow-the-leader.

“The UFOs were soon in front of the Library of Congress. That’s when

they made an arching loop north and headed back up First Street

towards their original location. For some reason, the UFOs started

bobbing up and down in the air as they flew back in the direction of

the Hart, Senate office building.

“While quickly approaching the building, they suddenly lifted up and

passed over top and continued north until they were no longer in

sight. ‘X’ has absolutely no explanation for what he saw that

amazing spring morning. However, those 15 minutes forever changed

his outlook on UFOs and life as he knows it.”

During my investigation, I learned from another ranking officer on

the Capitol Police force that many police officers serving at the

Capitol have encountered UFOs and then have had to write a report of

the event.

However, when I requested sanitized versions of these reports, my

request was denied. Apparently, although the Capitol Police would

like to tell their side of this strange story, other government

agencies with higher control over the security of the Capitol and

the Washington, D.C., area are simply not ready willing or able to

disclose this sensitive data to the public at this time.

© RMS 2010

May 24, 2010

Navy officer faces arrest if he doesn’t disavow secret UN talks on UFOs

Filed under: Uncategorized — bearmarketnews @ 11:18 pm



Navy officer faces arrest if he doesn’t disavow secret UN talks on UFOs

May 24, 1:22 PMHonolulu Exopolitics ExaminerMichael Salla, Ph.D.

Richard Theilmann, (Lt Commander) at New York Naval Commandery

On May 20, an article was published outing the original source leaking information about secret UFO discussions at the United Nations that began on February 12, 2008. The source in question showed this writer and up to six other researchers credentials revealing his identity as Richard Theilmann, Lieutenant Commander in the US Navy.  The military ID badge he showed me in October 2008 was valid for a three year period and had a bar code for scanning purposes. He also showed a service album showing many photos of his career in different military commands, including his name on a fighter plane on an aircraft carrier. Theilmann (aka Source A) explained that he was on reserve duty and would be activated for different covert missions – including a stint at the United Nations after he was reactivated in 2005 up to 2008. I was also aware of a meeting Theilmann had with Dr Bruce Maccabee at the Naval Warfare Center in April 2008 when he arrived at Maccabee’s laboratory unescorted. He did so by showing his military ID badge which was scanned and he was given the go ahead to bypass normal base security procedures for visitors. This led to Maccabee concluding that Theilman had sufficiently high security clearances and valid credentials in order to visit him unescorted. All this was used to support Theilmann’s claims that he was present at a secret set of UN discussions on UFOs.

In the period immediately after Theilmann’s February 2008 leak, other sources came forward to disclose the existence of secret discussions at the UN. The most important was a French UFO researcher, Gilles Lorant, who claims to have participated in closed door discussions on February 13-14. He described a new openness policy had been adopted by up to 28 nations, and this would begin in 2009 provided two conditions were met. One was that UFOs would continue to appear in large numbers, and that liberal democratic societies would not be destabilized by official openness on the UFO issue. Lorant’s testimony was supported by other sources including well known UFO researcher Dr Stephen Greer who knew of the French interest in disclosing the truth about extraterrestrial life.

A number of sources revealed that Lorant worked closely with French military intelligence. He quickly became the first major casualty of the UN UFO story when it was found that he had overstated his professional credentials. Lorant was quickly discredited in France but his story nevertheless was now in the public realm. For many, this was how plausible deniability worked in the covert world of UFO programs. The discrediting of Lorant was an example of how when the cover of covert operative is blown, they are discredited, disappear and are reassigned. Based on the outing of Source A as Richard Theilmann, the public may soon witness a repeat of the public discrediting of another covert operative who disclosed that the UN began having secret discussions on UFOs in 2008. More disturbingly, Theilmann is being threatened with arrest if he doesn’t disavow his earlier revelations about secret UN UFO discussions.

Today (May 24), I had a telephone conversation with Richard Theilmann about how he would respond to the outing of him by Stephen Broadbent, and the attempt to discredit him as a hoax. Theilmann explained that he was being coerced, and that as we were speaking, his military records were being expunged in case a failsafe contingency was activated to protect more senior Navy officials involved in the sanctioned leaking of the UN UFO discussions. The failsafe, if activated, would lead to him being arrested for impersonating a military officer and his public discrediting by the mainstream media. It had earlier been explained to me that the failsafe would lead to him serving a short stint in prison before being released, and reassigned for another covert mission involving extraterrestrial life. ‘Coincidentally’ a case of an ex-Navy Commander impersonating a military officer appeared on May 2. Was this rare occurrence just a ‘coincidence’, a veiled ‘warning’ to Theilmann, and/or was the public was being conditioned to accept a failsafe contingency in case Theilmann was outed? Another question worth asking is whether Broadbent and his investigatory team was being assisted in their outing of Theilman by opponents of the Navy’s effort to disclose the existence of UFOs?

In another ‘coincidence’ it was announced one day later on May 21 that Dennis Blair, a former four star Navy Admiral, was forced to resign as Director of National Intelligence. Blair was someone with the background experiences on UFOs that would be open to supporting a covert Navy effort to disclose the existence of UFOs and extraterrestrial life, and briefing President Obama.  Among the stated factors that went against Blair was that he wanted to promote closer intelligence ties between the U.S. and France.  That’s another curious ‘coincidence’ given the role of Lorant (and French military intelligence) in disclosing the existence of UN UFO discussions back in February 2008. Theilmann supported my suspicion of a link, and stated in our conversation that Blair’s resignation was part of a ‘pushback’ against the Navy. If a pushback is indeed occurring, it very likely is being orchestrated by the same forces that were earlier involved in silencing UN diplomats from discussing the secret UFO discussions. Along with Theilmann, two other sources confirmed that such coercion was being used against diplomats. One source was a serving European Ambassador who requested anonymity in revealing that such coercion was indeed happening.

In order to avoid the activation of the failsafe mechanism whereby his military records would be expunged, Theilmann explained to me that in a forthcoming telephone conversation he would have with Broadbent, tentatively arranged for May 25, he would discredit himself by saying that the UN UFO story was something he had fabricated based on events that occurred while he was at the United Nations in February 2008. His strategy was that by telling Broadbent that he made most of it up, based on conversations he had overheard, that further investigations by Broadbent et al would end. Theilmann hoped that the UN UFO issue would die away, and the failsafe would not be activated. Basically, I was being told that Theilmann was prepared to backtrack and lie to Broadbent about the reality of the UFO discussions at the UN in order to avert the failsafe mechanism. Theilmann’s intent was to protect his superiors in the covert world, the regular Navy and his own public humiliation if he was arrested for impersonating an officer.

As a researcher, I am committed to finding the truth about extraterrestrial life, and exposing official government/military/corporate policies to cover up its existence. I cannot therefore simply stand by and watch as Theilmann was point blank going to lie about his true role in leaking information about secret UFO discussions at the UN.  Furthermore, I do not accept the coercion that is currently being used against Theilmann to make him contemplate discrediting himself in order to avert an even more severe failsafe mechanism from coming into play. Something similar had already happened with, Gilles Lorant, the other major primary source revealing the existence of the UN UFO talks. The coercion used against covert operatives may be accepted by them as part of the standard MO of life with high security clearances. As a member of the general public, I am not obliged to play along especially when it comes to distorting the truth and preventing the public from learning more about what the UN has been secretly doing on the UFO/extraterrestrial issue.

Based on conversations subsequent to the outing of Richard Theilmann, nothing has deterred me from the conclusion that the secret UN discussions on UFOs occurred as Theilman, Lorant and other sources have described all along. Theilman’s visit to the Naval Warfare Center in April 2008 to meet with Dr Maccabee reveals that he did have a current military ID badge and security clearances, as he showed to me and other researchers. The documents witnessed supported Theilman’s claim that he had been reactivated from reserve status. Theilmann’s advance warning to me that he is about to admit to deceiving the Pickering brothers, who first told me about the UN UFO discussions, is itself a lie where he will directly seek to discredit himself.

I understand Theilmann’s predicament given the failsafe contingency he claims is hanging over his head that entails arrest and publicly discrediting him for impersonating an officer. The existence of such failsafe mechanisms is certainly one of the more inconvenient aspects of working in the covert world. Perhaps this article may prevent such a mechanism from being activated, and even dissuade him from disavowing his earlier stated positions as relayed by a number of intermediaries including this writer. I fervently hope so. His testimony is important and was a key part of an unfolding puzzle of official UN interest in UFOs and extraterrestrial life. Nevertheless, Theilmann has always been one among a number of sources revealing the existence of secret UFO discussions at the UN. The policy implications that such meetings have had at an international level are important to investigate more closely. That is especially so if there is a current pushback against UFO/extraterrestrial disclosure going forward, and primary sources are being silenced and/or threatened with arrest if they don’t disavow their testimonies.

May 2, 2010

Why is Hawking affirming time travel theory and appearing ignorant of DARPA secret time travel?

Filed under: Uncategorized — bearmarketnews @ 6:04 pm
Tags: ,


Why is Hawking affirming time travel theory and appearing ignorant of DARPA secret time travel?

May 1, 2:00 PMSeattle Exopolitics ExaminerAlfred Lambremont Webre

FIG. A – Andrew D. Basiago time traveled to Nov. 19, 1863 by DARPA

Fresh from eliciting polarized public responses to public statements urging humanity to avoid any contact with extraterrestrial civilizations on the grounds that all such contact may be dangerous, scientist Stephen Hawking, for over 30 years Lucasian professor of mathematics at Cambridge University, has now weighed in on the theoretical and operational reality of time travel as part of his Discovery Channel documentary series.

As Examiner.com reported, Hawking’s blanket negative statements about the intentions of extraterrestrial civilizations are reminiscent of U.S. and U.K. military-intelligence propaganda supporting the weaponization of space and a false flag war against extraterrestrials.  Prof. Hawking said, “We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn’t want to meet. I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonise whatever planets they can reach.”

Prof. Hawking’s statements on time travel can been seen in a segment (Episode 1-5) of the Discovery Channel documentary embedded in the article below.  In the documentary segment, Prof. Hawking first affirms the theoretical reality of time travel.  He then describes (and the documentary depicts) a theoretical time-travel portal in terms that are very similar to secret U.S. government time travel portals described by independent whistle blowers from U.S. time travel projects, Andrew D. Basiago, a Cambridge University graduate and former DARPA Project Pegasus time travel participant, and former U.S. serviceman Michael Relfe.

Although the literature about Mr. Basiago’s and Mr. Relfe’s operational time travel experiences in secret U.S. government programs is readily available and would come up in any scientific due diligence “Google” search by Prof. Hawking, Prof. Hawking goes on to postulate that “time travel wormholes” occur only at the quantum level and are “one billion trillionth trillionth of a centimeter” in diameter.  Science would have to expand these “time travel wormholes” to human size for time travel to be possible, according to Prof. Hawking.

According to Andrew D. Basiago, in the quantum access technology developed by the U.S. government, vortal tunnels are opened in time-space via Tesla-based teleporters.

It is reasonable to ask why Prof. Hawking, who first portrays time travel as possible and describes a realistic time travel portal almost factually would then postulate a situation so drastically at odds with what is now real – that the U.S. government has secretly had an operational time travel capability for more than 40 years.

Are Prof. Hawking’s statements negating the operational reality of quantum access time travel technology due to (1) an oversight, (2) faulty scientific due diligence, (3) a “paradigm” gap on Prof. Hawking’s part, (4) his ignorance of the “whistle blower” phenomenon regarding quantum access technologies (and extraterrestrial civilizations), or (5) an intentional misleading of the world population as to the state of quantum access technologies such as teleportation and time travel?

Stephen Hawking, Discovery Channel and time travel

Examiner.com readers can view the segment from Stephen Hawking’s documentary on time travel in which time travel is deemed theoretically possible, a schematic of an operational time travel portal is shown, and finally time travel is shown to be operationally not possible at present.  Please make certain you are watching Episode 1-5, as Episodes 2-5 to 5-5 also  appear in the video below.

DARPA time travel participant Andrew D. Basiago

Witness and documentary evidence for secret U.S. time travel

As Examiner.com has reported, Project Pegasus was a classified, defense-related research and development program launched by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in the late 1960’s.

In the following You Tube interview with Ms. Jessica Schab, Mr. Basiago “relates his experiences in DARPA’s Project Pegasus during the period 1969 to 1972, and describes probes to past and future events that he took via teleportation and chronovision during the early days of time-space exploration by the US government.”

According to Mr. Basiago, the US government already had a fully operational teleportation capability in 1967-68, and by 1969-70, was actively training a cadre of gifted and talented American schoolchildren, including himself, to become America’s first generation of “chrononauts” or time-space explorers.

This training, he said, culminated in 1981, when, as a 19-year-old, he teleported to Mars, first by himself after being prepared for the trip by CIA officer Courtney M. Hunt, and then a second time in the company of Hunt.  Both trips, Mr. Basiago said, were made via a “jump room” located at a CIA facility in El Segundo, CA.  The apparent purpose of the trips to Mars was to familiarize him with Mars because the CIA knew of his destiny pertaining to publicly establishing the fact that Mars is an inhabited planet and deemed it important that he visit Mars and experience its conditions first-hand.

Mr. Basiago’s involvement in advanced US time-space research as a child, as well as Courtney M. Hunt’s identity as a career CIA officer, have been confirmed by Dr. Jean Maria Arrigo, an ethicist who works closely with US military and intelligence agencies, and by US Army Captain Ernest Garcia, whose storied career in US intelligence included both serving as a guard on the Dead Sea Scroll expeditions of Israeli archaeologist Yigal Yadin and as the Army security attaché to Project Pegasus.

Remote sensing in the time-space continuum

Mr. Basiago has revealed that between 1969 and 1972, as a child participant in Project Pegasus, he both viewed past and future events through a device known as a chronovisor and teleported back and forth across the country in vortal tunnels opened in time-space via Tesla-based teleporters located at the Curtiss-Wright Aeronautical Company facility in Wood Ridge, NJ and the Sandia National Laboratory in Sandia, NM.

In one time probe to the future undertaken by Project Pegasus from a chronovisor device located at ITT Defense Communications in Nutley, NJ, Mr. Basiago viewed the US Supreme Court building in Washington, DC as it would be in the year 2013.  During this probe, he found that the Supreme Court building was under 100 feet of stagnant water and reported this to the Lieutenant Commander from the Office of Naval Intelligence who debriefed him after the probe to the future was completed.  He hastens to add that because the chronovisors did not identify absolute, deterministic futures but rather alternate futures in the “multi-verse,” this catastrophic vision of Washington, DC might be from an alternative time line that does not materialize on our time line.

In contrast to the chronovisor probes, in which a form of virtual time travel was achieved, the teleporters developed by Project Pegasus allowed for physical teleportation to distant locations, sometimes with an adjustment forward or backward in time of days, weeks, months, or years.  According to Mr. Basiago, by 1972, the US government was using “quantum displacement” of this kind to both send people forward in time several years to store sensitive military secrets in the future and backward in time several years to provide the government current intelligence about future events.

Societal impact of chronovision and teleportation

Andrew D. Basiago’s Pegasus revelations establish that a secret, advanced US time-space program emerged 40 years ago.  For four decades, this program has used esoteric technologies involving chronovision and teleportation to perform “remote sensing in time” of past and future events.  For the past three decades, teleportation has also been used to send individuals from Earth to strategic US bases on Mars.  He is adamant that these technologies be revealed so that their positive and negative aspects can be debated and their positive aspects used to advantage humanity.

Chronovision, he said, could be used to create an international network of virtual museums in which images from the past would be shown to enlighten and educate the public.  Misapplied, such technology could also be used to create a Fascist society based on 24-hour surveillance of individuals by government, which may have been portended by the DARPA project called “Total Information Awareness” that President George W. Bush established and placed under Admiral John Poindexter.

Teleportation is a second quantum access technology developed with public funds that the public is being denied the full benefits of.  Teleportation could be used, Basiago said, to move people and goods more quickly and efficiently around the globe, without the pollution caused by planes, trains, and automobiles or the negative land use effects from airports, railroad tracks, and highways.  Yet, if it is not declassified, teleportation will remain what it has been for 40 years, that is, a weapon for use only by the US military, to have the option to put troops precisely where they are needed on battlefields.

Corroborative documentary (photographic) evidence of Andrew D. Basiago’s secret U.S. government time travel

There exists quantum access documentary (photographic) evidence in the form of a time travel artifact that resulted from Andrew D. Basiago’s childhood participation in DARPA’s secret time travel program in the early 1970’s.

The ALTA reports and Web Bot technology have specifically identified Mr. Basiago, an emerging figure in the disclosure movement, as a “planetary whistle blower” based on the global significance of his revelations. Exploring this time travel artifact will help establish a frame of reference for Examiner.com readers to better evaluate evidence gathered by quantum access technology and time travel participants like Mr. Basiago.

Corroborative documentary evidence of the veracity of Mr. Basiago’s time travel expeditions on behalf of the U.S. government exists.  This documentary evidence consists of a photograph of Mr. Basiago taken at the scene of U.S. President Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address on November 19, 1863 after he was teleported to that location in the time-space continuum via DARPA time travel technology.

Andrew D. Basiago at Gettysburg, PA on November 19, 1863 (Gettysburg Address)

Figure A (above) is a photograph of Andrew D. Basiago as a Project Pegasus time travel participant taken at the site of U.S. President Abraham Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address on November 19, 1863, to which Mr. Basiago had been teleported back in time by DARPA.

Mr. Basiago has publicly answered questions about this corroborating photographic evidence of his time travel experiences in the secret U.S. government program in which time travel was achieved.

Q: Is this [Figure A] the photo of you on November 19, 1863?

Andrew D. Basiago: Yes. I am the boy standing in the foreground of the image at center-left, looking to his right. My shoes were lost in the transit through the quantum plenum that took me from the plasma confinement chamber at the time lab in East Hanover, NJ in 1972 to Gettysburg, PA on the day that Abraham Lincoln gave his famous address there in 1863. When I walked into downtown Gettysburg, where the shops were, after walking into town along the north-south arterial that led into Gettysburg, a cobbler by the name of John Lawrence Burns accosted me and took me inside a millinery shop and furnished me with a pair of men’s street shoes and a Union winter parka that he took from a stack of military clothing in a storeroom at the back of the shop. In this image, one can see how over-sized the shoes were. I can confirm that this image was taken right after President Lincoln arrived on the dais, because when I walked over to this location and stood in this manner to detract attention from my shoes, I had been standing over by the dais, and Lincoln had not yet arrived, and I only stood in this position for several minutes before the quantum field effect produced by the plasma confinement chamber ended and I found myself back in the time lab in New Jersey.

Q: This is incredible, Andrew! I did not know there were pictures. Was this a picture (Figure A) discovered that just happened to have you in it, or was this picture taken by those with you and you brought it back?

Andrew D. Basiago: To my knowledge, this was the only photograph that was taken in a past or future time when I was time traveling for DARPA’s Project Pegasus. I think another breakthrough will come in the form of accounts from residents of Santa Fe [New Mexico] about children suddenly appearing at the state capitol complex there in the early 1970’s. Our arrivals were sometimes witnessed. Several of my own arrivals were witnessed. I have spoken with area residents who knew that individuals were teleporting into Santa Fe in the early 1970’s. Some of that knowledge resulted from the arrival of teleportees, including myself, being seen by others; other knowledge resulted from the fact that employees of LANL [Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM] were bringing stories about the teleportation that was going on home from work and sharing them with their children around the dinner table in Los Alamos and White Rock.

Q: What were you looking at [in the photograph in Figure A]?

Andrew D. Basiago: Nothing, intentionally. I was wearing a hodgepodge of clothes: the Union bugle boy uniform that I had been issued back in East Hanover, NJ in 1972; the Union winter parka that Burns had outfitted me in when I walked into town shivering in the brisk autumn air; the huge men’s shoes that he gave me when I walked into town barefoot. When I walked over to the dais, several women were gossiping about me (presumably, because I was apparently a bugle boy separated from his regiment or a carpetbagger). I was questioned by two Union officers about where my regiment was bivouacked. I also had a strange encounter with my father, who was dressed as a Pennsylvania farmer and standing in front of the dais, in which he intentionally ignored me. He later said that encountering me there at Gettysburg was how he found out I was going to be in the program. But he was startled to see me and not expecting me to be there, [he] acted like he didn’t know who I was. After I was questioned by the two Union officers, I was concerned that I should make myself inconspicuous. We had been trained to avoid being conspicuous, being questioned, being arrested, being detained, and so on, because these things might create complications that would prevent us from getting back to the present. So, self-conscious about the huge shoes that I was wearing and trying to avoid being further noticed, I walked about 100 paces from the dais and stood with my back to the dais looking in the opposite direction from where I knew Lincoln would be arriving. I hoped that by affecting an air of non-chalance in this manner, I would avoid further scrutiny by those present. It didn’t work! I ended up becoming the first time traveler from the future to be photographed!

Q: How much information about the future has Project Pegasus learned about?

Andrew D. Basiago: My experiences in Project Pegasus indicate that by 1970, the US government was using chronovision to capture remotely and record on film a vast amount of footage of past and future events. When we visited the project location at Flemington, NJ — where I was shown remote images of the signing of the US Constitution in 1787 and saw George Washington and Benjamin Franklin as they appeared in life — we could see that the technicians there were filming reams and reams of scenes of past events on 16 mm film stock and storing it in film canisters. Presumably, this process is done digitally today.

Q: Is Project Pegasus still active?

Andrew D. Basiago: I do not know whether Project Pegasus is still active, but the intelligence infrastructure that evolved from it is in all likelihood very active at this time. Project Pegasus was a small, highly secret research and development program launched in the late 1960’s. However, the technologies that it developed gave the US government the keys to past and future events. My guess is that the quantum access capabilities that Project Pegasus provided the US government are now headquartered at some form of national intelligence center that provides the President, the intelligence community and the military information about future events.

Q: Was just the military involved or was the government also involved?

Andrew D. Basiago: Project Pegasus combined individuals employed by the US military (Navy, DARPA), the US intelligence community (CIA) and civilian defense contractors (e.g., Parsons). It was a research and development program of the US Department of Defense (DoD).

Q: How could a father actually put his son through all of these violent and possibly fatal transportation experiments?

Andrew D. Basiago: It is my position that my father and I were proud to serve our country during its hour of maximum danger and were also privileged to be involved in America’s early activities in time-space exploration. My father did not involve me in Project Pegasus. Rather, we were approached by the US government and told we had to be involved for reasons that remain a mystery. In all likelihood, we were identified by project personnel from the future, who knew from the perspective of their time that we had been involved in the program, and hence we were brought into the program to create the future program that had knowledge of our past involvement.

Q: Why was not an adult the one transported so that the information brought back might be more precise?

Andrew D. Basiago: Children were involved for five main reasons. First, we were experimental test subjects into the physical and mental effects of teleportation on children. Second, we were necessary participants because the holograms produced by the chronovisors would collapse if adults were involved and so small, cooperative, intelligent human beings were needed as the time travelers in the chronovisor probes, and therefore a decision was made to involve gifted and talented American school children. Third, we were regarded as better participant-observers of the past and future events accessed in the program because children are tabula rasa — blank slates whose perceptions are not skewed by the selection bias produced by their previous experiences. Fourth, we were trainees who were expected to become America’s first generation of “chrononauts” in a fully fledged time-space program when we grew up. Fifth and lastly, the Department of Defense found that when adults were involved in time travel, the psychologically destabilizing effects of moving between alternate time lines was causing some adult time travelers to become insane, so it was hoped that by training time travelers from childhood a competent cadre of US time travelers could be formed.

Q: How could a child possibly be put through all of this and also remember everything he saw or even understand what he saw or heard?

Andrew D. Basiago: I am a gifted individual with exceptional powers of observation and memory. These gifts were identified when I was being trained in Project Pegasus. In one test, I recited back random numbers provided to me verbally to 84 places. I was identified as the future whistle blower about Project Pegasus even while I was still serving on the project. I have spent over 10 years investigating my experiences and proving them to an historical certainty. I am an individual who did remember what I saw and heard, so it is not valid to say that I couldn’t have done so because a child couldn’t or shouldn’t have been able to. That involves the fallacy of using the general to refute the specific. I not only remembered much of what I saw and heard, but I later wrote it down and went back and investigated it and proved my memories. Consequently, I am now able to provide an insider’s account of the US government’s time-space program at the time of its emergence in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.

Independent whistleblower witness evidence of U.S. government time travel

Andrew D. Basiago is not the only whistle blower witness from a formerly associated with secret U.S. time travel programs.

Quantum access technology is used to time travel U.S. armed service personnel who serve as permanent staff at the secret U.S. base on Mars and to age-regress them back to their original time-space starting date after the completion of their 20-year rotation cycle on Mars.

Thus, the secret U.S. base on Mars may be hyperdimensionally “cloaked” from civilian society on Earth, and “hidden” in covert niches in the time-space hologram.

Two independent whistle blowers, both former U.S. armed service personnel stationed at the U.S. secret base on Mars, have now come forth with detailed accounts of their experiences on Mars.

Time travel whistle blower Michael Relfe is a former member of the U.S. armed forces who in 1976 was recruited as a permanent member of the secret Mars colony.  In 1976 (Earth time), he teleported to the Mars colony and spent 20 years as a permanent member of its staff. In 1996 (Mars time), Mr. Relfe was time-traveled via teleportation and age-regressed 20 years, landing back at a U.S. military base in 1976 (Earth time).  Mr. Relfe then served six years in the U.S. military on Earth before being honorably discharged in 1982.

In a two-volume book authored by his wife, Stephanie Relfe, B.Sc., The Mars Records, Mr. Relfe describes the two types of individuals at the secret Mars colony:

“To clarify: Remember there are two kinds of people that I remember.

“1. People visiting Mars temporarily (politicians, etc.) – They travel to and from Mars by jump gate. They visit for a few weeks and return. They are not time traveled back. They are VIP’s. They are OFF LIMITS!!

“2. Permanent staff – They spend 20 years’ duty cycle. At the end of their duty cycle, they are age reversed and time shot back to their space-time origin point. They are sent back with memories blocked. They are sent back to complete their destiny on Earth.”  (Vol. 2, p. 204)

AP: Stephen Hawking at Texas A&M lecture, April 5, 2010

Stephen Hawking’s statements about time travel

In the Discovery Channel documentary, Prof. Hawking makes a statement about time travel that is a mixture of (1) near factual description of a time travel portal such as those used on DARPA Project Pegasus time travel operations to the future and the past, as described by former Project Pegasus participant Andrew D. Basiago, mixed in with a (2) “quantum” theory holding that “time travel wormholes” occur only at the quantum level and are “one billion trillionth trillionth of a centimeter” in diameter.

Science would have to expand these “time travel wormholes” to human size for time travel to be possible, according to Hawking.  Thus having raised realistic expectations of time travel in an initial several minutes video introduction, Prof. Hawking then summarily dashes the probability of present operational quantum access time travel capability with an explanation that runs contrary to empirical eyewitnesses and documentary evidence of contemporary U.S. secret time travel.  According to Andrew D. Basiago, in the quantum access technology developed by the U.S. government vortal tunnels are opened in time-space via Tesla-based teleporters.

One source states that “Disinformation is false or inaccurate information that is spread deliberately. It is synonymous with and sometimes called Black propaganda. It may include the distribution of forged documents, manuscripts, and photographs, or spreading malicious rumors and fabricated intelligence. Disinformation should not be confused with misinformation, information that is unintentionally false…. A common disinformation tactic is to mix some truth and observation with false conclusions and lies, or to reveal part of the truth while presenting it as the whole (a limited hangout).  The Cold War made disinformation a recognized military and political tactic.”

Are Prof. Stephen Hawking’s Discovery Channel statements intentional “disinformation,” calculated to mislead the public about the existence of operational quantum access time travel technology?

1.  The Hawking “psyops” about extraterrestrial civilizations – As Examiner.com has reported, it is more likely than not that Stephen Hawking is engaged in a conscious and deliberate disinformation campaign designed to engender fear about extraterrestrial civilizations amongst the human population.  Readers are referred to “Hawking: A U.K. psyops to promote space weaponization and a false war against extraterrestrials?

Stephen Hawking’s April 25, 2010 public statements about extraterrestrial civilizations can be plausibly interpreted as a part of a larger psy op – psychological operation – by U.K. military intelligence to use Hawking’s carefully crafted profile as Royal Society protégé to brainwash the human population into fear-driven support of the weaponization of space, and acceptance of a possible false flag war in space against a hyperdimensional extraterrestrial civilization which is being groomed as a foe of humanity’s sovereignty over Earth’s 3rd dimension.

If Stephen Hawking has been recruited by U.K military-intelligence (or some other entity) to engage in a disinformation campaign about extraterrestrial civilizations, then the likelihood is that the information that he is imparting about the science of time travel is also part of an intentional “disinformation” campaign that is escalating.

2.  Content analysis of Hawking’s time travel statements – A content analysis of Prof. Hawking’s statements about time travel in the Discovery Channel documentary reveals that it conforms to a standard definition of “disinformation.”  Prof. Hawking appears to be engaging in “a common disinformation tactic, [which] is to mix some truth and observation with false conclusions and lies, or to reveal part of the truth while presenting it as the whole (a limited hangout).”

3.  The “Sacred Cow of Science” effect – Prof. Hawking appears to have been groomed as a “Sacred Cow of Science.” Stephen William Hawking, CH, CBE, FRS, FRSA, “was one of the youngest elected members of the Royal Society in 1974, a lifetime member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, recipient of the U.S. Presidential Medal of Freedom, Fellow of Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, a Distinguished Research Chair at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Ontario, and Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge for 30 years.”

Not only is Prof. Hawking a “Sacred Cow of Science,” by the evidence he is a protégé of the Royal Society, which “which is dominated by a Masonic network connected to the British monarchy, military-intelligence agencies, and City of London financial institutions.”

Prof. Stephen Hawking appears to be a prime disinformation asset of some unknown entity, carrying out what meets the definition of “disinformation” with regard to two key areas of official disclosure affecting the public interest and the human future:  the intent and presence of extraterrestrial civilizations, and the existence of operational quantum access teleportation and time travel technology.

As he is a “Sacred Cow of Science,” the views expressed by Prof. Hawking must be challenged with empirical eyewitness and documentary (photographic) evidence, which this Examiner.com report on the existence of quantum access time travel technology used by secret U.S. government programs has done.

Seattle’s relationship to Exopolitics and this article:  According to Examiner.com, this reporter -Alfred Lambremont Webre – is “one of two experts in the field of exopolitics and this topic doesn’t generally lend itself to a local angle”.  This reporter is very proud to have this Exopolitics Examiner column based in Seattle.  Historically, “the modern phenomena of UFOs and ‘flying saucers’ began in Washington state on June 24, 1947, when Kenneth Arnold spotted nine mysterious, high-speed objects ‘flying like a saucer would’ along the crest of the Cascade Range near Mount Rainier. His report made international headlines and triggered hundreds of similar accounts of ‘flying saucers’ locally and across the nation.”  A local Seattle connection is thus embedded into every Examiner.com article this reporter has the privilege to write for our Seattle audience.
For more info:
Hawking: A U.K. psyops to promote space weaponization and a false war against extraterrestrials?
Will extraterrestrial “disclosure” or contact happen in 2012?
Web Bot: Andrew Basiago is predicted “planetary level” whistleblower for Mars life and time travel
Second whistleblower emerges to confirm reality of time travel
UK releases past UFO reports, will destroy future UFO reports, avoids government ET/UFO “conspiracy”
Scientists at UK Royal Society ET conference unaware of extraterrestrial presence on Earth
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of any organization with which the author may be affiliated.

Click here tofindout more!

Permission to use extracts & copyright notice
Note: Permission is granted to include extracts of this article on websites and email lists provided a link is included to the original. This article is copyright © and should not be added in its entirity on other websites or email lists without author’s written permission. For permission please contact: exopolitics@exopolitics.com

April 29, 2010

The Real Jason Bourne: Stop MK ULTRA and all of its secret sub-projects!

Filed under: Uncategorized — bearmarketnews @ 12:20 pm
Tags: , ,

Cross Posted from BEAR MARKET NEWS as an interrelated story…

War Is Crime is an independent weblog from Paris, France. Our mission is to provide the Truthers with analysis of what really happens in and to the world, and to show why it happens this and not other way.

War Is Crime is the publisher of The Dot Connector magazine.

Stop MK ULTRA and all of its secret sub-projects!

Duncan O’Finioan  |  DuncanOFinioan.com 1,440 views

Greetings from the Survivors of Project Talent.

We, the survivors of MK ULTRA and all of its sub-projects — Project Talent being one of them — are coming to you, the leaders of the free world, for redress. We request action on this matter post-haste, as we have waited long enough for our respective governments to take notice of our tortures, trials, and tribulations that were forced upon us as children by the same said governments.

We ask for recognition of all that was done to us, all that is still being done to us, and recognition of duties that we performed for our respective countries in the name of freedom and national security.

We request our files be shown to us. We request public recognition for all that was done and is still being done. We request apologies from same said governments. We request face to face meetings with the highest officials of our respective countries in order to discuss this matter on a personal level. We request Congressional hearings in the United States to address this subject. We feel this is very little to ask in lieu of what was done to us, and what is still being done to us.

You, the abovementioned, are the leaders of the free world. Please stand up and act like it.

The torture of children can in no way ever be condoned by any country for any reason. It is our highest wish to have a public announcement that these projects using children will be stopped.

Our resolve is beyond what any normal person could ever imagine, and we shall not stop until our grievances are dealt with.

We respectfully await your replies, if any. Fore, we contacted various government leaders separately in the past and have never once received a reply. Is this the way governments of the free world react to people like us?

We are not, as we have been told, “used goods”, to be tossed to the wayside when their usefulness has ended.

Thank you,

Duncan O’Finioan
And the People of Project Talent

The Dot Connector  magazine

Duncan O’Finioan’s true story is the Bourne films on steroids

Duncan’s life essentially ended at age six when his parents handed him over to the CIA for mind control experiments. MK Ultra’s Project Talent took innocent children and tortured and manipulated them into serving their perverse goals. Today, only a few hundred remain alive and most will not or cannot tell their stories.
A car accident that almost broke his neck caused his memory to be flooded with images of his lost years….Black Ops, assassinations, Cambodia at age twelve, endless days of being tortured and beaten, lost periods of time, questions. The MRI machine started smoking when it came in contact with an implant in his skull. X-rays show other implants.
Recently the CIA released the Family Jewels documents and nearly hidden on page 425 is the paragraph outlining “potentially embarrassing Agency activities”. These activities included administering mind or personality altering drugs to unwitting subjects as young as four. Sensory deprivation, electroshock, hypnosis, and drugs were used to to create multiple personalities that could perform specific tasks. Historians have learned that creating a “Manchurian Candidate”-style subject was undoubtedly a goal of MKULTRA and related CIA projects.
The story of the CIA documents appeared in the Australian Times. Nothing has been reported in the American media. Why?
Duncan’s first book, “Innocence Turned Deadly” received five star reviews on amazon.com. One reviewer says: “This remarkable first novel of Duncan O’Finioans brings to mind another first published in my lifetime, CATCHER IN THE RYE. INNOCENCE TURNED DEADLY has the same classical input into today’s circumstances as CATCHER’S had those years ago. The urgency lies in the factual information such as when he writes about the Gestapo. Believe it. It is the Truth”.

The second highly anticipated book, “Deadly Awakening”, is nearly finished. A feature film is in development. His is a story that must be told. What incriminating government secrets does his alternate personality know that will be revealed under hypnosis?
View interviews at http://projectcamelot.net/duncan_o_finioan.html

Hear him tell of his mission to “terminate” the very drunk, future President of the United States… George W Bush; of targeting Americans as a programmed assassin under the command of an undisclosed agency; and the selection, torture, and brutal training process that he endured and which children are undergoing to this day.
“When they can walk in, take you as a child, turn you into a killer and then use you, abuse you, and when they are done, throw you away. It shouldn’t happen”. Duncan O’Finioan


Extraterrestrials, Stargate Technology and Dan Burisch: Public Disclosure or Disinformation? You Decide.

Filed under: Uncategorized — bearmarketnews @ 12:01 pm
Tags: , , ,

Exopolitics: political implications of the extra-terrestrial presence

Extraterrestrials, Stargate Technology and Dan Burisch: Public Disclosure or Disinformation? – Exopolitics Comment #56

In a recent two hour interview conducted by Project Camelot, (Dr) Dan Burisch speaks about stargate technology, both natural and artificial, and how this has been used by both extraterrestrials and various government entities to travel or send information through time (see: http://projectcamelot.org/dan_burisch.html ). A ‘natural stargate’ is similar to an Einstein-Rosen bridge or ‘wormhole’ which has been theorized to form when space-time is distorted by the intense gravitational fields generated by collapsing stars. Collapsing stars compress to the extent that they form a point of singularity wherein time slows down in relation to outside observers. Singularity points have been hypothesized to exist at the center of black holes, and it is possible that they exist in other locations wherein space-time is significantly distorted by an intense gravitational field. At a singularity point, time would effectively stop as it dilates to infinity as predicted by Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity. This would make it possible for anyone able to survive even briefly, the intense gravitational fields accompanying a singularity point, to emerge into whatever future date they desired. Physicists also consider it theoretically possible for an Einstein-Rosen bridge to form wherein one could travel backwards in time. So a singularity point, at least in theory, offers a means to travel forward or backward in time.

Singularity points, however, are highly unstable and require enormous quantities of energy to keep one open if travel through one was viable. Kip Thorne from the California Institute of Technology has argued that as long as an exotic form of matter could be deployed to keep the singularity point open, then a “traversable wormhole” or stargate was theoretically possible. Consequently, in theory at least, a singularity point that is kept open offers a means for objects or life forms to move through time. According to Professor Paul Davies, it would be possible to create a time machine if a singularity point could be found, and technology existed to keep it open for the time traveler. Davies also describes a process whereby advanced civilizations might control such a natural stargate or wormhole: “wormholes may have formed naturally in the big bang, so that an advanced spacefaring civilization might expect to discover one in the galaxy and commandeer it…” (How to Build a Time Machine, p. 69).

So the principles behind stargates as a form of time travel technology are generally well known to scientists and feasible, albeit for advanced technologies that are not yet available to the general public. The question is do such technologies secretly exist in the classified world of extraterrestrial related projects? That is where Burisch’s testimony becomes significant since he claims to have been involved in such projects. In what follows, I first describe Burisch’s claims and then evaluate these. Given the intense controversy surrounding earlier public revelations by Dan Burisch case, it’s important to consider the merits of his claims concerning stargate technologies without being drawn into the contrasting polemical positions on his authenticity and significance.

In the recent interview, Burisch argues that stargate technology basically allows its users to physically enter or move material through time and into different time streams. Burisch claims that artificial stargates are instruments that tap into ‘natural stargates’ in order to operate. He believes there are approximately 50 artificial stargates present on the planet with an undisclosed number of natural stargates. He argues that information for the development of artificial stargates came from ‘cylinder seals’ extracted from Iraq from both the first (1991) and second (2003) Gulf War military interventions by the US and its allies. The cylinder seals contain extraterrestrial information given to the ancient Sumerians who faithfully replicated this information on cuneiform texts. Burisch’s information gives plausibility to the thesis that U.S. military intervention into Iraq was motivated by the desire to discover and control stargate technology. At least one other recent whistleblower interviewed by the Project Camelot team, who uses the pseudonym ‘Henry Deacon’, claims that Burisch’s information on stargates is correct (http://projectcamelot.org/livermore_physicist.html ). Burisch claims that an offshoot of stargate technology is Project Looking Glass, a window into different time lines. He claims that Looking Glass technology was reverse engineered from artificial stargates. Burisch argues that Looking Glass technologies give the user a direct view into different probabilities of future events or different time streams. So while stargate technology enables one to travel or send material back and forth in time, Looking Glass enables one to view probable future events or what is occurring in a different time stream.

Burisch claims that stargate technology was used by extraterrestrials to enter into the Earth’s timeline, but was only used by humans to send information into different time streams. He claims that due to the highly unstable nature of stargates, that it was deemed too dangerous to send humans through them. This is contrary to the testimony of other whistleblowers associated with the Montauk Project and Project Talent, that children were regularly used for time travel experiments regardless of safety considerations. For example, Stewart Swerdlow claims that he was one of the few survivors of experiments involving children and time travel technologies.

In a private interview on January 4, 2007, Duncan O’Finioan revealed to me that one of the covert missions he served on while secretly recruited into Project Talent between the ages of 14-17, involved him entering into a stargate or ‘dimensional portal’ that instantly transported him to an unknown destination. He didn’t recall any markings around the stargate. He remembered that the event horizon was smoky and that he experienced “no emotions, no fear and no joy” when going through the stargate. At the destination, an old building with stone tables and floors, he witnessed 7-8 dead bodies all wearing black uniforms identical to the one he was wearing. Most were teenagers similar in age to himself except one who looked almost 30. None had weapons suggesting that they had been trained as he had in Project Talent to use psychic abilities for self-defense. The testimonies of other whistleblowers suggest that Burisch’s claims regarding government authorities not using stargates out of safety concerns for travelers are not accurate.

Burisch also argues that as a result of events associated with 2012, that the artificial stargates have been deactivated in case they contribute to possible future calamities. He refers to events such as heightened solar activity during the next solar maximum that peaks on 2012 as part of a series of events leading to catastrophic global outcomes. He refers to possible catastrophes as the reason for why the three extraterrestrial factions have come to this present timeline to influence current events. He argues that the Stargate/Looking Glass technology cannot be used to predict what exactly will transpire in 2012 and its immediate aftermath, and that a number of possibilities exist. These possible outcomes lead to different timelines which pertain to each of the three extraterrestrial factions he describes.

Burisch claims that Looking Glass technology was used to foresee terrorist attacks on the U.S. around the new millennium, and possible future wars with Islamic states. This is another dubious aspect of Burisch’s stargate testimony since it runs contrary to the emerging literature on the 911 ‘terrorist attack’. This research has conclusively shown 911 to have been an ‘inside job’ that required the use of a number of advanced demolition technologies. This included thermite to destroy the inner steel columns of the twin towers (see http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/thermite.htm) and/or Direct Energy Weapons arguably used to vaporize the collapsing Twin Towers (see http://drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam1.html ).

There are a number of other claims made by Burisch in the interview that are contrary to the research findings of other investigators into the extraterrestrial phenomenon. He claims for instance that the extensive number of extraterrestrial civilizations cited by other whistleblowers/experiencers is disinformation. This is contrary to the extensive evidence that 60 or more extraterrestrial civilizations are currently intervening on Earth (see: http://exopolitics.org/Report-ET-Motivations.htm ).

In the interviews, Burisch comes across as very sincere and animated in the beliefs and opinions he holds about government policies and the intervention of extraterrestrial life in human affairs. There is little doubt from his body language and other non-verbal cues that he is telling the truth as he believes it. However, there is a difference between accurately relating true events, and accurately relating fabricated events that one has been manipulated into believing to be true. Such a distinction is vitally important when evaluating the testimonies of whistleblowers that have been subjected to mind control procedures as part of the security protocols used for classified projects. Such security procedures very likely involve implanting a certain degree of false information or disinformation into a whistleblower’s belief system in the event that s/he goes public about what they witnessed or experienced. Burisch has acknowledged that in the past mind-control techniques have been used to remove his memories as a consequence of him releasing unauthorized information. This leads to the very real possibility and likelihood, that his current memories have been altered as part of security procedures adopted in the classified projects he has worked on.

Consequently there are three questions that need to be considered in evaluating Burisch’s testimony concerning the existence, use, and development of stargate technology. First, how much of the current information he reveals is based on his actual experiences, and how much is a product of altered memories? Second, how much of the information he reveals, is in fact disinformation relayed to him through his superiors in classified projects? Finally, what is the long term agenda of those using Burisch in what appears to be an acclimation program that presents a complex dynamic between three different factions of extraterrestrials and secret government authorities interfacing with these factions?

Based on evidence presented and the investigations conducted by other researchers, Burisch has been involved in classified projects concerning extraterrestrial technologies and biological entities. The most helpful collection of documentation supporting Burisch’s claims to having worked in classified projects is veteran UFO researcher Bill Hamilton’s book, Project Aquarius (see: http://www.astrosciences.info/Aquarius.htm ). Due to Burisch’s psychological tendencies, it is very likely that he was at some time earmarked as an individual with a high propensity to become a whistleblower. Such a scenario in fact was described in a letter received by Hamilton (see: http://www.angelfire.com/pe/peter7/Links/MessageMJ1Burisch.html ). Ostensibly written by a member of the MJ-12 Special Studies Group setting policy on extraterrestrial affairs, the letter describes how Bob Lazar and Dan Burisch were both earmarked early in their careers as psychologically most likely to become whistleblowers. They would subsequently be used to acclimate the general public to the reality of extraterrestrial life and technology. Lazar apparently became too much of a loose cannon and was released from the acclimation project soon after becoming initially involved. In contrast, Burisch was deemed to be more psychologically suitable for a long term acclimation program where he would reveal classified information in a manner that was in alignment with the goals of MJ-12 Special Group.

It is Burisch’s psychological make up that makes him suitable for an acclimation program that mixes factual information concerning events he has directly experienced as part of his classified research, and disinformation relayed to him designed to throw the public off track. Burisch himself acknowledges he has difficulty with the disinformation he has been fed in terms of deceptive statements by the MJ-12 leadership. Such disinformation and the public disclosures they accompany would enable a long term agenda promoted by the MJ-12 Group. It is very likely that this agenda most pertains to public disclosure of the extraterrestrial life and events concerning 2012. The disinformation and inconsistencies surrounding Burisch’s disclosures has been the most common source of the intense criticism leveled towards his authenticity as a whistleblower. It is therefore important in considering Burisch’s testimony that a significant proportion of it is likely laced with disinformation. Another significant part of it is likely an accurate description of events, procedures and personnel associated with MJ-12 Group classified technologies. Therefore there is valuable data to be gleaned from the Burisch interviews, though much work has to be done in identifying possible disinformation.

A helpful method for dealing with the inherent challenges posed by Burisch’s disclosures is to separate information that he has directly experienced or witnessed that directly pertains to his classified activities, from information he was told that is not directly pertinent. It is more likely the case that non-pertinent information is laced with disinformation. For example, Burisch was told that he was temporarily recruited into the MJ-12 Group as MJ-9 for a short period given the delicacy of negotiations with extraterrestrial visitors over stargate technologies. It is likely that circumstances surrounding Burisch’s ‘promotion’ to MJ-12 was possible disinformation designed to influence his beliefs concerning the importance of his classified activities.

In evaluating Burisch’s testimony concerning stargates, one has to consider the degree to which this was relevant to his alleged biological research in Project Lotus which examined the feasibility of cellular regeneration using an esoteric particle describe as the Ganesh particle (see: http://www.think-aboutit.com/conspiracy/DanBurischTheGaneshParticle.htm ). If it was pertinent, which his training and circumstances appear to warrant, then it is likely that the information concerning stargates and Looking Glass technology is based on factual events. However, other aspects of his testimony concerning the motivations of different extraterrestrial factions, the intent to educate the general public about events concerning 2012, and his continued role in MJ-12 Group operations is more likely laced with disinformation.

In conclusion, the Burisch case will undoubtedly continue to raise controversy due to the polemical positions taken by supporters and critics of his public disclosures. There is a need to discern what is valuable in Burisch’s disclosures of classified technologies, and to separate it from disinformation designed to distract and confuse researchers. This is especially important when it comes to the topic of stargate technology and likelihood that such technology drives geopolitical events such as the 1991 and 2003 military interventions in Iraq. If stargate technology exists to the extent Burisch describes, and this is technology that he directly experienced, it is important to consider his testimony on its merits. The growing scientific interest in the feasibility of ‘traversable wormholes’, time travel or stargate technology, makes it important to consider whistleblower sources from the classified world describing the existence of such technologies and their varying applications.

Michael E. Salla, Ph.D
Kona, Hawaii


A note of gratitude to Kerry Cassidy and Bill Ryan from Project Camelot who made freely available to the general public their recent interview with (Dr) Dan Burisch. For those wanting to support Project Camelot in their important work of documenting whistleblower testimonies for the general public, please visit: http://projectcamelot.org/get_involved.html


Forward as you wish. Permission is granted to circulate among private individuals and groups, post on all Internet sites and publish in full in all not-for-profit publications. Contact author for all other rights, which are reserved

April 28, 2010

Hawking: A U.K. Psyops to Promote Space Weaponization and a False War Against Extraterrestrials: Big Mistake

Filed under: Uncategorized — bearmarketnews @ 7:12 pm
Tags: , , ,

Seattle Exopolitics Examiner

Hawking: A U.K. psyops to promote space weaponization and a false war against extraterrestrials?

April 28, 1:01 PMSeattle Exopolitics ExaminerAlfred Lambremont Webre

Wiki: Stephen Hawking at NASA – Date unkown (1999, 2001, or 2003)

As Examiner.com reported on January 25, 2010, “Scientists at UK Royal Society ET conference are unaware of the extraterrestrial presence on Earth.”

Alfred Lambremont Webre reported that “Scientists presenting at the Royal Society [conference on extraterrestrial life in January 2010] present a darker evolutionary picture of the threat of extraterrestrial civilizations visiting Earth. Simon Conway Morris, professor of evolutionary­paleobiology at Cambridge University, is quoted as stating that ‘Extra-terrestrials might not only ­resemble us but have our foibles, such as greed, violence and a tendency to exploit others’ resources. And while aliens could come in peace they are quite as likely to be searching for somewhere to live, and to help themselves to water, minerals and fuel.’ Open scientific discussion about the existence of extraplanetary life is reportedly encouraged in this conference.   At the same, the Royal Society conference involves mainstream scientists who seem largely unaware of the evidence for an existing extraterrestrial presence on Earth at this time.”

Stephen William Hawking, CH, CBE, FRS, FRSA, elected member of the Royal Society in 1974, a lifetime member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, recipient of the U.S. Presidential Medal of Freedom, Fellow of Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, a Distinguished Research Chair at the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Ontario, and Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge for thirty years, has now repeated fellow Cantabriensis professor Simon Conway Morris public ignorance of the documented presence of extraterrestrial civilizations on Earth at this time.

“To my mathematical brain, the numbers alone make thinking about aliens perfectly rational,” Prof. Hawking stated on April 25, 2010. “The real challenge is to work out what aliens might actually be like.”

“We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn’t want to meet. I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonise whatever planets they can reach,” Hawking says.

“If aliens ever visit us, I think the outcome would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans,” the scientist says. While there may be benign aliens out there, Hawking says trying to make contact is “a little too risky”.

As expected, Hawking’s statements have drawn a wide spectrum of public responses.

There is, however, plausible contextual evidence, that Stephen Hawking’s carefully crafted statements as a protégé of the Royal Society may in fact be a component of a long-term psychological operation (“psyops”) by U.K. military intelligence to brainwash the human population the human population into fear-driven support of the weaponization of space, and acceptance of a possible false flag war in space against a hyperdimensional extraterrestrial civilization which is being groomed as a foe of humanity’s sovereignty over Earth’s 3rd dimension.

FIG. B – Wiki: Temple of the Rosy Cross – Invisible College symbol

Hawking’s statement on ET civilizations

Hawking and the Royal Society

Hawking is one of the youngest members ever to be inducted into the Royal Society, the U.K.’s academy of sciences.  One source states, “In 1974 Hawking was inducted into the Royal Society. The Royal Society traditional induction ceremony includes the new members walking on stage and signing a ledger book. This book goes back to the earliest days of the society with even the signature of Sir Isaac Newton. When Hawking was inducted, the tradition was broken when Sir Alan Hodgkin, the president of the Royal Society, carried the book to where Hawking was seated for his signature. The entry of Hawking into the Royal Society is an achievement that cannot be overstated, when one considers that he was not expected to live beyond twenty–five years of age. Hawking still believes that being inducted into the Royal Society was the proudest moment of his career.”

Founded in November 1660, “The Royal Society of London for the Improvement of Natural Knowledge, known simply as the Royal Society, is a learned society for science, and is arguably the oldest such society in existence…. It was granted a Royal Charter by King Charles II as the ‘Royal Society of London’. The Society was initially an extension of the ‘Invisible College’, with the founders intending it to be a place of research and discussion. The Society today acts as a scientific advisor to the British government, receiving a parliamentary grant-in-aid. The Society acts as the UK’s Academy of Sciences, and funds research fellowships and scientific start-up companies.”

One sources states that “The Invisible College was a precursor to the Royal Society of the United Kingdom. It consisted of a group of natural philosophers (scientists) including Robert Boyle, John Wilkins, John Wallis, John Evelyn, Robert Hooke, Christopher Wren, William Petty and Jose Rizal. In letters in 1646 and 1647, Boyle refers to ‘our invisible college’ or ‘our philosophical college’. The society’s common theme was to acquire knowledge through experimental investigation.”

Figure B (above) sets out the Rosicrucian emblematic image of the Invisible College, known as the Temple of the Rose Cross.   One source states, “Rosicrucianism is the theology of a secret society of mystics, said to have been founded in late medieval Germany by Christian Rosenkreuz. It holds a doctrine ‘built on esoteric truths of the ancient past”, which, “concealed from the average man, provide insight into nature, the physical universe and the spiritual realm.’  It is symbolized by the Rosy Cross. Between 1607 and 1616, two anonymous manifestos were published, first in Germany and later throughout Europe. These were Fama Fraternitatis RC (The Fame of the Brotherhood of RC) and Confessio Fraternitatis (The Confession of the Brotherhood of RC). The influence of these documents, presenting a “most laudable Order’ of mystic-philosopher-doctors and promoting a ‘Universal Reformation of Mankind’, gave rise to an enthusiasm called by its historian Dame Frances Yates the ‘Rosicrucian Enlightenment’. Rosicrucianism was associated with Protestantism and in particular Lutheranism.  According to historian David Stevenson, it was also influential to Freemasonry as it was emerging in Scotland.  In later centuries, many esoteric societies have claimed to derive their doctrines, in whole or in part, from the original Rosicrucians. Several modern societies, which date the beginning of the Order to earlier centuries, have been formed for the study of Rosicrucianism and allied subjects.”

The 1974 initiation of Stephen Hawking into the Royal Society was thus functionally his initiation into an institution with a Masonic, rather than a scientific, legacy.

AP: Stephen Hawking at Texas A&M lecture, April 5, 2010

Cantabs Stephen Hawking and Simon Conway Morris as Royal Society protégés on extraterrestrials

It may be more than a curious coincidence that both Simon Conway Morris, professor of evolutionary­paleobiology at Cambridge University and a keynote speaker at the Royal society January 2010 conference on extraterrestrial life at the, and Stephen Hawking, Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge for thirty years and one of the youngest members ever to be inducted into the Royal Society, should parrot each other with almost the same verbatim observations about the dangers of interacting with all extraterrestrial civilizations.

It is not unreasonable to consider that, as Royal Society protégés, Stephen Hawking and Simon Conway Morris and may be intellectual stalking horses for U.K. military-intelligence, which wants to portray extraterrestrials as hostile in order to promote the weaponization of space, and to continue the truth embargo of the extraterrestrial presence of Earth.

As Examiner.com reported on March 1, 2010 in UK releases past UFO reports, will destroy future UFO reports, avoids government ET/UFO ‘conspiracy’, “the implications of a secret November 11, 2009 U.K. Ministry of Defence Memorandum and the latest U.K. UFO data dump [are] more stonewalling and psychological displacement about the extraterrestrial and UFO issue.  With its twin actions of (1) shutting down the U.K. Ministry of Defence public UFO reports desk and (2) adopting a secret policy of destroying all UFO reports after 30 days, the U.K. Ministry of Defence has effectively adopting a public response profile and policy of the U.S. Department of Defense.  It has done so with a psyops show of mock paranoia toward the exopolitical research community, and a false note of ‘no inter-governmental communication regarding the extraterrestrial presence’.  All of this has the impact of, and is most probably calculated to, result in more official obfuscation and stonewalling regarding the extraterrestrial presence.

“Events like January 2010 U.K. Royal Society meeting on extraterrestrial life and actions like the U.K. Ministry of Defence shut-down of its public UFO desk appear to be a calculated obfuscation of the extraterrestrial presence. Conventional-minded observers have stated that events like the January 2010 U.K. Royal Society meeting on extraterrestrial life are in fact a preparation for extraterrestrial disclosure, by providing a public platform for mainstream scientists to state their views on the extraterrestrial presence.

“In fact, the Royal Society conference involved mainstream scientists who seem largely unaware of the evidence for an existing extraterrestrial presence on Earth at this time.”

Stephen Hawking may be part of a U.K. military intelligence psyops

In this larger context, Stephen Hawking’s April 25, 2010 public statements about extraterrestrial civilizations can be plausibly interpreted as a part of a larger psyops – psychological operation – by U.K. military intelligence to use Hawking’s carefully crafted profile as Royal Society protégé in brainwashing the human population into fear-driven support of the weaponization of space, and acceptance of a possible false flag war in space against a hyperdimensional extraterrestrial civilization which is being groomed as a foe of humanity’s sovereignty over Earth’s 3rd dimension.

How to evaluate information about the ethical intentions of extraterrestrial civilizations

1.  U.K. Royal Society source – Be extremely cautious and skeptical of any information or opinions about extraterrestrial civilizations that is sourced by scientists or organizations connected with the U.K. Royal Society, which is dominated by a Masonic network connected to the British monarchy, military-intelligence agencies, and City of London financial institutions. To download Dope, Inc. – Britain’s Opium War Against the U.S. (PDF) documenting the goals of these inter-locking networks since the reign of U.K. monarch George III (1738-1820), who attempted to introduce an Opium war type destabilization of the young American revolution, as had been done to China, please click here.

2.  Marsgate and Alternative 4 – Familiarize yourself with the whistleblower witness and documentary evidence of a U.S. secret survival colony on Mars, and on an advanced, intelligent humanoid civilization living under and on the surface of Mars, whose fragile surface ecology has been shown by NASA rover photographs to harbor humanoid and animal life.

Here are some background resources on the U.S. secret base on Mars and on the Martian civilization:

Basiago and Eisenhower reveal “Marsgate” and make case for “Alternative 4”

Two whistleblowers independently report teleporting to Mars and meeting Martian extraterrestrials

Whistleblower Laura Magdalene Eisenhower, Ike’s great-granddaughter, outs secret Mars colony project

3.  2012: Hyperdimensional or False flag war – Become acquainted with the evidence-based Examiner.com series on 2012, covering the issues of whether there is a genuine hyperdimensional or a false flag war in the making with hyperdimensional extraterrestrials.

2012: Cataclysmic breakdown or Y2K makeover? ET/UFO contact? DNA/Consciousness transformation?

Will extraterrestrial “disclosure” or contact happen in 2012?

2012:  Ethical extraterrestrial/hyperdimensional civilizations seek to contact, assist humanity
Coming soon to

Seattle’s relationship to Exopolitics and this article:  According to Examiner.com, this reporter -Alfred Lambremont Webre – is “one of two experts in the field of exopolitics and this topic doesn’t generally lend itself to a local angle”.  This reporter is very proud to have this Exopolitics Examiner column based in Seattle.  Historically, “the modern phenomena of UFOs and ‘flying saucers’ began in Washington state on June 24, 1947, when Kenneth Arnold spotted nine mysterious, high-speed objects ‘flying like a saucer would’ along the crest of the Cascade Range near Mount Rainier. His report made international headlines and triggered hundreds of similar accounts of ‘flying saucers’ locally and across the nation.”  A local Seattle connection is thus embedded into every Examiner.com article this reporter has the privilege to write for our Seattle audience.

Click   heretofindoutmore!

Alien Jigsaw: Black Man in Black and ET – Human Risks

Filed under: Uncategorized — bearmarketnews @ 2:00 am

by Ernie Karhu and Meryl Johnson

1) Black Man in Black

I’ve been a “voluntary” contactee since 1942 (on Easter Sunday). On that day, they told me that they were beginning what appeared to be a new phase of contact; what I would now term as creating a new infrastructure of contact; the imagery was that of the building of bridges. Since then, I’ve met others that have had lifelong contact. My sense today. in retrospect, was that this contact was hyper-dimensional involving some sort of morphic resonance. The setup is quite redundant: nothing particularly special in terms of my involvement. I was four years old at the time and my parents reported I was absent for approximately 6 hours. They never forgot my unusual story.

One of the most fascinating contactee stories was “validated” inadvertently by others. The events occurred in dense metropolitan NYC and witnessed in detail by numerous others. The following story was sent to me from a friend who lives in New York City and has had numerous encounters with aliens (not of this world) there randomly for many years now. She wrote:

“I hadn’t had any unusual experiences for months, so I’d begun to think that they were probably over. Also, that I’d probably imagined the whole thing. Now, without fail, every time I’ve decided that I must have imagined it all, something really unusual has happened to make me doubt that. It was early October, beautiful weather, and I was housecleaning. I dumped the litter box, then discovered I was out of kitty litter, so I ran out to get some.

It was just after 5 and the sidewalk was crowded with well dressed Wall St. types coming home from work. I was dressed in my rattiest, tattered housecleaning clothes and hoped I was invisible. I noticed an extremely tall, extremely handsome black man coming towards me, perfectly dressed in a black suit with a vest and red tie, black hat, black umbrella, black gloves. Even in that well dressed crowd you couldn’t miss him. When he got to me he said in a loud voice, “Oh, no! We’re not going to forget our little Meryl! Don’t worry, we’ll never forget about our little Meryl! How could we?” He kept this up, I just sort of cringed, nodding, while a little crowd gathered around us. Finally he laughed, and started dancing, leaping in the air and clicking his heels, going towards the river. “Who IS that?” the crowd demanded. I said I had no idea. “Isn’t he an actor? An athlete? A model?” I repeated that I didn’t know who he was. “But he knows your name!” We argued for awhile, then I went to the store and got my kitty litter.

This was a very ambiguous incident and could have been taken as either sinister or encouraging depending on how one viewed one’s experiences, and I think that’s true of a lot of this stuff. Now for part 2 of this story, which happened several years later. There’s a very good theater group in Brooklyn that wanted to do a play about experiencers. They interviewed Budd Hopkins, John Mack, some of their experiencers. I was part of a group called SPACE, and they wanted to interview us. Some of us went to the Brooklyn Academy of Music and we had a very formal meeting with maybe six of them, very serious, sincere young actors and writers. I was asked to tell them my “Black Man in Black” story, so I did, and they liked it. I didn’t learn until months later that after they left the meeting and were heading down the steps to the subway they noticed a very tall, handsome black man dressed in black coming up towards them. They thought, “hmmm,” but in Brooklyn that’s not exactly unusual. When he got to them he grinned and said, “I’ll bet that story really got through to you, didn’t it?” They turned around to stare at him as he left, and on the back of his jacket there was a large Planet Earth in red.”

2. Risks of Human – ET Communication

Among the many risks involved in contact experience is attributing more to them than the sense of the experience: The following was written by my NYC friend for the Alien Jigsaw.


As for the risks involved, they’re quite serious. The biggest risk, so far as I can see, is the risk of self-delusion and self-deception. These experiences can serve as a quick trip to serious trouble in our lives if we assume that our interpretations are correct and act accordingly. This is true regardless of whether we give them positive or negative interpretations. There’s no point at which we can be entirely certain that we are interpreting these experiences correctly and know exactly what they mean. There’s still plenty that we have to learn. Having these experiences doesn’t mean that we’re in any way special or elite, or receiving special information from superior beings, either. I’ve been scolded more than once for becoming too trusting of my teachers! Which, again, seems peculiarly honest of them.

We remain responsible for ourselves, our behavior, and our own lives. We have no reason to suppose that the aliens are here to rescue us, take care of us, or be responsible for us in any way. We also have no reason to assume that we’re under their control and pass responsibility for what happens to them. Assuming that they’re arranging marriages, require us to move to different parts of the country, etc., can lead to disaster – unless it’s in our own best interest to do these things.

Why should we take their advice any more seriously than that of anyone else’s? Sometimes, months later, I can see that something that seemed extremely personal, and maybe helpful or harmful, at the time, was merely a quest for information on their part. Since we’re all powerful individuals in our own right – both them and us – there are considerable risks on both sides. We need to be careful and work hard at developing better communications, taking nothing for granted as actually “solved” yet. Our minds are constructed for problem solving, to reach conclusions and demand immediate answers and explanations. This is one area in which we’re not going to get this degree of certainty without a lot of hard work. At this point, interpretations are speculation. Letting our imaginations create myths out of this material is not the correct response.”

by Meryl Johnson, ©1996


Alien Invasion: Why the Wall Street Journal is Dead Wrong Re: Stephen Hawking

Filed under: Uncategorized — bearmarketnews @ 12:47 am

The Wall Street Journal


April 27, 2010, 10:45 AM ET

Alien Invasion: Why Stephen Hawking is Wrong

By Paul Davies

Houghon Mifflin Harcourt

When British cosmologist Stephen Hawking warned against contact with extraterrestrials in a new Discovery Channel documentary, he was repeating a well-worn argument. “If aliens ever visit us, I think the outcome would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn’t turn out very well for the Native Americans.”

But Hawking’s reasoning is flawed on a number of counts. First, we can ask why the aliens would come here with guns blazing. What could they possibly want? Hawking suggests that Earth’s resources might be a reason. “I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonize whatever planets they can reach.”

It is a chilling image, reinforced by science fiction stories from “War of the Worlds” to “Independence Day,” but the argument doesn’t really wash. A super-civilization capable of making starships would certainly have the means to observe Earth in detail from many light years away, and they would have known all about our planet’s resources for as long as they had possessed advanced technology.

Here we hit another common misconception. Earth is about 4.5 billion years old, and there were stars and planets around long before the solar system even existed. Assuming intelligent life is likely, as Hawking suggests, then some alien communities would have emerged a very long time in the past. If resources are the motivating factor, then at least one group of aliens would surely have spotted Earth as a desirable destination millions of years ago, and come here when they could have had the planet for the asking, without pesky humans to complicate the takeover.

Another problem with Hawking’s picture is the sheer distances involved. The galaxy is huge by human standards. The nearest star is over four light years away -– about 25 trillion miles. Within the scientific community, even the optimists believe the nearest civilization could well be hundreds of light years away. Because nothing can travel faster than light, the Hollywood image of aliens plying the vast interstellar voids in star fleets is absurd. It’s far more likely that alien civilizations would limit contact to radio communication rather than engage in the sort of close encounters favored by movie makers.

Everett Collection
“The War of the Worlds” poster art from 1953.

But suppose by some fluke aliens did come to visit Earth in the near future, then comparisons with Columbus are in any case wide of the mark, and reflect the rampant anthropocentrism that pervades much speculation about alien life. Just because we go around wiping out our competitors doesn’t mean aliens would do the same. A civilization that has endured for millions of years would have overcome any aggressive tendencies, and may well have genetically engineered its species for harmonious living. Any truly bellicose alien species would either have wiped itself out long ago, or already taken over the galaxy.

By comparison, humans would quite likely be considered dangerous warmongers, posing a possible menace to our galactic neighbors in centuries to come. If so, then ET may act to eliminate the threat if we didn’t mend our violent ways. Ironically, the greatest danger from an alien encounter may be ourselves.

Paul Davies is author of “The Eerie Silence: Renewing Our Search for Alien Intelligence.” He also chairs the SETI Post-Detection Taskgroup, and is a Professor at Arizona State University.

Last paragraph above, emphasis mine, Bear says: either way, we lose…

Boeing and Lockheed are both working on a gravitational drive over 100 times FTL. Lockheed initially considered a “tachyon” drive.

Then there were rumors of “stargate” technology and worm holes. Rumors also abounded regarding “looking glass” technology that suggested that the existing Stargates be closed. …something about cracks in the space/time continuum and cosmic warming.

Turns out, however, they are here and have been for quite some time. How’s that been working out for us?

What do they want and why are they here? Because they are and need more “space”. They’re getting anything they want. Kinda like the corporatists.

More later…

Next Page »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.